šŸ§± Why Security Operations Canā€™t Scale Without Automation

John W8MEJ Menerick Ā· April 2, 2025

Overwhelmed SOCs are triaging 10,000+ alerts dailyā€”most of which are false positives. The problem isnā€™t detection. Itā€™s saturation.

Security operations centers (SOCs) were never meant to scale like this. What began as centralized log review has ballooned into an arms race of dashboards, SIEM queries, and tier-1 analysts buried in alert queues. Meanwhile, attackers have automated everything from lateral movement to domain privilege escalation.

The defenders? Still writing detection rules by hand and responding to threats manually.

Itā€™s no wonder SOC fatigue is realā€”and dangerous. But hereā€™s the good news: we donā€™t need to scale humans linearly with threats. We need to rethink how detection and response works altogether with updated statistical methods.


šŸ§  The Broken Mental Model: Rules, Escalation, React

The traditional model is simple, but flawed:

  1. Ingest logs
  2. Write detection rules
  3. Trigger alerts
  4. Escalate to humans
  5. Hope someone takes action

This ā€œfirefightingā€ approach doesnā€™t scale. It burns out analysts, overlooks subtle signals, and rewards reactive posture over proactive control.

The more data we ingest, the more noise we generate. And the more rules we write, the more fragile the system becomes.


šŸ” A Better Way: Autonomous Security Loops

Imagine this instead:

  1. A new service emits logsā€”no schema? No problem.
  2. A statistical machine learning model based detection engine scores those events using an Energy-Based Model (EBM).
  3. High-risk behaviors trigger a playbook creation and playbook execution ā€” not a person.
  4. That playbook takes actionā€”containment, investigation, enrichment.
  5. The system tests itself. Refines itself. Improves itself.

No tickets. No fatigue. Just a self-healing loop of detection, response, and optimization.


šŸ” Real-World Insight

In one pilot deployment of this system, a mid-sized SOC reduced its manual triage time by over 90% in 47 days. False positives dropped. Playbook efficiency rose. And tier-2 engineers finally had space to focus on real threats.

The secret wasnā€™t adding more alerts. It was cutting through the noise with intelligent, adaptable automation.


šŸ”„ From Firefighting to Engineering

You donā€™t need 10 more analysts. You need one good loop. And the confidence to let it evolve.

This isnā€™t about removing humans from securityā€”itā€™s about freeing them from toil so they can operate at their best: asking questions, validating signals, and designing new defenses.


šŸŽÆ Your Move

Ask yourself:

  • Is your alert pipeline generating insight - or inertia?
  • Are your analysts solving problems ā€” or swimming through dashboards?

If the answer stings, youā€™re not alone. But youā€™re not stuck.

šŸ‘‰ Explore how autonomous detection and response loops can transform your SOC. Read the full white paper or dive into the latest podcast episode to learn more.

Share on: